|
|
The 13th World Congress on Controversies in Obstetrics, Gynecology & Infertility (COGI) Held jointly with The German Society of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Maritim Hotel, Berlin, Germany, November 4-7, 2010 |
|
| |
| Fetomaternal Medicine |
 |
|
|
|
|
Thursday, November 4, 2010
|
| 17:30-19:00 |
Opening Session |
|
Keynote Lectures - Leaders' prospective on the future Technology-based advances in obstetrics, gynecology and infertility facilitate earlier, less-invasive diagnosis: What does the future hold for our main subdisciplines? |
| Chairpersons |
Z. Ben-Rafael, Israel K. Diedrich, Germany B. Fauser, Netherldands R. Fischer, Germany Z. Shoham, Israel |
|
17:30-17:55
|
Reproductive Medicine ART: Where did we come from; where we are heading?
R. Frydman, France |
|
17:55-18:20
|
Fetomaternal Medicine Genetic diagnosis on fetal cells in maternal blood: Will it ever become routine?
G.C. Di Renzo, Italy |
|
18:20-18:40
|
Gyn-Oncology Ovarian Cancer: Can new markers change the fate of the disease?
R.G. Moore, USA |
|
18:40-19:00
|
Reproductive Medicine ART: The Future of Reproductive Medicine P. Patrizio, USA |
|
|
|
| 19:00-20:30 |
Opening and Cocktails |
|
08:30-10:00 |
The Challenges of Perinatal Viability |
|
Capsule |
Despite great advances in perinatal medicine, the challenges of the gestational period from 22 to 26 weeks are still poignant for the perinatologists
|
| Chairperson |
J. Dudenhausen, Germany D. Farine, Canada |
|
|
Outcome of the periviable infant: Have we reached the limit? M. Carrapato, Portugal |
|
|
What is the best method to deliver very premature babies? D. Skupski, USA |
|
|
Economic considerations in the management of the periviable infant M. Carrapato, Portugal |
|
Ethical dimensions in obstetric and neonatal care of the periviable infant F.A. Chervenak,USA |
|
Objectives |
Upon completion of this session, the audience will have learned: |
|
|
* To understand the burden of very premature delivery on medical, economical, societal and parental issues * To understand the risk of vaginal vs. Cesarean for periviable infants * To apply ethical principles to challenges evolving from perinatal management of the periviable infant
|
| 10:00-10:20 |
Coffee break |
|
10:20-11:50 |
Early Diagnosis of Premature Rupture of Fetal Membranes (PROM) Sponsored by an unrestricted grant from AmniSure® International LLC |
|
Capsule |
Early diagnosis of PROM by highly sensitive and specific tool, can enhance treatment of this hazardous fetal and maternal condition |
|
|
D. Farine, Canada A. Grunebaum, USA H. Helmer, Austria |
|
|
|
Debate: Are we now in the Verge of Resolving the Longstanding Controversy that has Surrounded PROM Diagnosis?
PROM and the Controversy that surrounded its Diagnosis. A. Grunebaum, USA
The Advent of the PAMG-1 Immunoassay lay to rest the controversy regarding diagnosis of PROM H. Helmer, Austria
Discussion | |
|
|
|
|
Objectives |
Upon completion of this session, the audience will learn |
|
|
* The risks involved in an inaccurate diagnosis to both patient and physicians * The clinical and financial burden of inaccurate diagnosis * How available tools can enhance diagnosis of PROM |
|
11:50-12:10 |
Poster viewing |
|
12:10-13:40
|
Prematurity
Sponsored by an unrestricted grant from Hologic (UK) Limited |
|
Capsule |
Despite the high perinatal morbidity and mortality associated with preterm delivery, no existing tool is specific enough to diagnose premature labor, and no good and reliable intervention is available early enough to interrupt the vicious circle of labor. The question is: Can we really decrease prematurity? |
| Chairpersons |
A. Shennan, UK J. Deprest, Belgium |
|
|
Diagnosis of preterm labor (PTL) and prediction of premature delivery: Who to treat, and who not to treat?
A. Shennan, UK |
|
|
|
Debate: Is Cervical Length Measurement Necessary over Biochemical Markers to Predict Preterm Birth?!
The combined use of cervical length (CL) and cervicovaginal fetal fibronectin (fFN) in women with threatened preterm labour W. Henrich, Germany
Ultrasound cervical length measurement is mandatory during preterm birth assessment B. Arabin, Netherlands
Discussion |
|
|
|
What are tocolytics good or bad for?
G.C. Di Renzo, Italy |
|
Objectives |
Upon completion of this session, the audience will have learned: |
|
|
* The pitfalls of diagnosis and treatment of PTL * Selecting who to treat * The place of late cerclage in the management of bulging membranes * Technique, indication, and contraindication of late cerclage
|
| 13:40-14:30 |
Lunch break |
|
14:30-16:00 |
Uterine Contractility |
|
Capsule |
Controlling uterine contractility to induce or prevent labor is the most important task of current obstetrics. What do we have in hand, and what are we striving for?
|
|
|
J. Dudenhausen, Germany N. Gleicher, USA |
|
|
What is the best method for induction of labor? TBA |
|
|
Carbetocin: A new player on the block? D. Farine, Canada |
|
Efficacy of non-medical methods to induce labor I. Blickstein, Israel |
|
Objectives |
To acquire understanding of the following: |
|
|
* To understand methods to induce labor in different settings * New opportunities to prevent premature labor
|
| 16:00-16:30 |
Coffee break |
|
16:30-18:00 |
Progesterone: From Luteal Support to Abortions |
|
Capsule |
The growing place of progesterone support during pregnancy, by indication or off label, deserve a critical evaluation. Many recent publications indicate the safety of various preparations in the management of threatened abortion, recurrent abortions, and to reduce preterm labor. |
| Chairperson |
J. Dudenhausen, Germany |
|
|
The growing palace of progesterone in prevention of prematurity and pregnancy complications G.C. Di Renzo, Italy |
|
|
Improving blood flow with Dydrogesterone as a method to prevent abortions S. Daya, Canada |
|
|
Prevention of recurrent abortions and treatment of threatened abortion by progesterone F. Facchinetti Modena, Italy |
|
Objectives |
* Understanding the role of different Progeterone compounds in the prevention of early and repeated abortion * Appreciating the increasing role of Progeterone support to prevent premature labour |
|
Saturday, November 6, 2010 |
|
08:30-10:00 |
Controversies in Prenatal Diagnosis and Therapy |
|
Capsule |
Implementing modern diagnosis and therapy continues to provoke controversies
|
|
Chairpersons |
F.A. Chervenak, USA
A. Grunebaum, USA |
|
|
Management of complicated MC twins
J. Deprest, Belgium |
|
Amniocentesis vs. CVS?
A. Antsaklis, Greece |
|
|
Fetal therapy
J. Deprest, Belgium |
|
|
Controversies in the management of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome
D. Skupski, USA |
|
Objectives |
To appreciate the continuing improvements in obstetrical ultrasound |
|
|
* To understand current developments in the management of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome * To appreciate new developments in invasive fetal therapy
|
|
10:00-10:20 |
Coffee break |
|
10:20-11:50 |
Avoiding Invasive Prenatal Diagnosis |
|
Capsule |
The race to attain a complete, noninvasive prenatal genetic diagnosis remains, as yet, an unachieved goal of perinatology. Nevertheless, refinement of old tools and advances in new tests are indications of the future. What are the hurdles to achieve a noninvasive prenatal genetic diagnosis, and how do ethical and patient choices affect this dilemma?
|
| Chairpersons |
J. Deprest, Belgium B. Arabin, Germany Y. Zalel, Israel |
|
|
Only a few anomalies will escape detection with ultrasound and biomarkers: Should we be content with this combined tool? |
|
|
|
Debate: Proposition: Chorionic villous sampling (CVS) is the next step after increased NT
A. Anstaklis Greece Opposition: CVS should be performed only if detailed screening for anomalies is negative
M. Bronshtein, Israel
Discussion |
|
|
Objectives |
Upon completion of this session, the audience will learn: |
|
|
* The advantages and limitations of current methods * Recognize all the added values of early ultrasound screening * Recognize the full constellation related to prenatal diagnosis
|
| 11:50-12:10 |
Poster viewing |
|
12:10-13:40 |
Prediction of Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy |
|
Capsule |
Hypertensive disorders associated with underlying placental and maternal changes, and are associated with endothelial dysfunction and vasospasm, leading to placental insufficiency and serious consequences to the mother and infant. A major development was achieved in the recent years in identifying various markers and tools for predicting the disorders. In addition to the traditional collection of medical and obstetric history and measurements of blood pressure and urine proteins, the effectiveness of pulsatility index of the uterine artery, pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A, placental growth factor, placental protein 13 (PP13) and direct measurements of endothelial dysfunction were shown to be very promising markers. However, since the exact pathophysiological mechanism leading to this condition is still poorly understood, it is difficult to devise a prevention plan. Hence, the question is: what is the medial benefit for prediction? Could close surveillance of the patient at risk can prevent the pathology or save maternal and fetal life? Should we keep investing in prediction in the absence of an ultimate preventive treatment?
|
|
Prediction of preeclampsia by biomarkers - the scientific and clinical data and prospective for improved perinatal service and prevention B. Huppertz, Austria |
|
|
|
Debate: Should we Strive to Predict Pre-eclampsia?
Proposition: Prediction is possible with newer methods and this is the first step towards prevention!
B. Huppertz, Austria
Opposition: Investing in prediction of pre-eclampsia is futile, since there is no effective treatment G. Visser, The Netherlands
Discussion |
|
|
|
What can we learn from measuring endothelial dysfunction? G. Pillar, Israel |
|
Objectives |
Upon completion of this session, the audience will have learned about:
* New research and tools to predict pre-eclampsia
* The role of PP-13 measurements
* The place of endothelial dysfunction measurements
|
| 13:40-14:30 |
Lunch break |
|
14:30-16:00 |
3-D and 4-D Ultrasound in Modern Perinatal Medicine and Neurobehavioral Assessment |
|
Capsule |
3-D and 4-D ultrasound represents the height of modern ultrasound technology, but the role of this technology remains controversial
|
| Chairpersons |
A. Antsaklis, Greece B. Arabin, Germany |
|
|
|
Debate: Should 3-D and 4-D Ultrasound be Used in Every Pregnancy? Pro: A. Kurjak, Croatia Con: F.A. Chervenak, USA
Discussion |
|
|
|
Are the current criteria valid for defining a causal relationship for cerebral palsy?
I. Blickstein, Israel |
|
|
Potential of 3-D and 4-D ultrasound for neurobehavioral assessment in perinatal medicine
M. Stanojevic, Hungary
|
|
|
|
|
Objectives
|
* To establish whether 3/4-D ultrasound is indicated in every pregnancy? * To establish whether 3/4-D ultrasound is of value for neurobehavioral assessment in perinatal medicine? * To understand the relationship of intrapartum events to cerebral palsy
|
| 16:00-16:30 |
Coffee break |
|
16:30-18:00 |
Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM): "Holy Grail" or More Doubts? |
|
Capsule |
This debate is certain to continue: Evidence-based medicine (EBM) has become the new “Holy Grail” of clinical decision making. Of course, EBM is, however, only as good (or bad) as the best available evidence (BAE). BAE, in turn, is dependent on the quality of published studies, which are often weak because of poor study design, flawed statistical evaluations, or outright fraud. Meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials (as propagated by Cochrane) have become a favored tool in establishing BAE, often overlooking that many of these trials are seriously underpowered and, therefore, do not allow for the conclusions they claim. EBM may, therefore, possibly be viewed with the same healthy degree of skepticism as that for IBM programmers who brought “garbage in, garbage out!” to the early days of software development
|
| Chairpersons |
B. Fauser, Netherlands J. Studd, UK |
|
|
|
Debate: EBM: What's Next? Proposition: EBM represents the only valid approach towards medical decision making S. Daya, Canada Opposition: EBM has limited value in daily clinical care and cannot replace clinical judgment N. Gleicher, USA Discussion | |
|
|
Can we really conduct efficacy trials in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with pregnancy as the outcome when the conclusion is likely to be worthless because of postrandomization manipulation?
S. Daya, Canada |
|
Objectives |
Upon completion of this debate, the audience will learn: |
|
|
* How BAE is established * Advantages and limitations of BAE * Levels of evidence and how they are established * Different clinical study formats and their respective advantages and disadvantages |
|
08:30-10:00 |
Ultrasound (US) Screening for Anomalies |
|
Capsule |
Screening for anomalies with US is widely used. However, many elements of the examination remain controversial
|
| Chairpersons |
A. Kurjak, Croatia K. Vetter, Germany
|
| Discussants |
M. Bronshtein, Israel A. Antsaklis, Greece M. Stanojevic, Croatia
Y. Zalel, Israel |
|
Hot Controversies |
Expert Opinions on: |
|
|
-
Nasal bone: Fact or myth?
-
Can "family album" assist in prenatal US screening?
-
What can be gained by combining transvaginal screening (TVS) with transabdominal screening (TAS) in late (24 weeks) sonographic screening?
-
Does intra-amniotic sludge predict preterm delivery?
-
Can we agree on the definition of Dandy-Walker syndrome in ultrasonography?
-
Early (14-16 weeks) or late (18-22 weeks) screening
-
Amniotic band syndrome: Fact or myth
-
Ultrasound: Its reliability in the diagnosis of placenta accreta and vasa previa
-
Elective fetal reduction: In the early or late first trimester
-
Folic acid: Can it prevent other conditions or only NTD? And at what dose?
-
Elective fetal reduction: In the early or late first trimester |
| 10:00-10:30 |
Coffee break |
|
10:30-12:30 |
Controversies over Endless Cesarean Delivery and Multiple Pregnancies |
|
Capsule |
Cesarean delivery, the most common surgical procedure performed, continues to generate controversies that challenge all obstetricians. The almost universal use of CS to deliver multiple pregnancies adds to the problem
|
| Chairperson |
F.A. Chervenak, USA |
|
|
What is the ideal Cesarean delivery rate?
B. Serra, Spain |
|
|
Patient choice - Cesarean: The role of evidence and ethics
F.A. Chervenak, USA |
|
Elective preterm delivery for all monochorionic (MC) twins?
I. Blickstein, Israel |
|
Outcome of multiple pregnancies - 2010: Spontaneous vs. iatrogenic
M. Carrapato, Portugal |
|
Objectives |
To respect the impact of iatrogenic prematurity caused by Cesarean delivery |
|
|
* To provide ethical appropriate strategies for dealing with patient-requested Cesarean delivery
* To understand hot controversies in the management of multiple pregnancies |
|
|
|
|