|












| |


SUNDAY, OCTOBER 31, 1999
|
08:30 - 10:30 HALL A
|
|
B4:
|
ULTRASOUND SCANNING FOR FETAL
MALFORMATION
Capsule: Ultrasound is becoming a potent tool in detection of fetal
malformations - the cost-benefit, risks and indications.
|
|
Chairpersons: |
N.M. Fisk, UK
A. Ludomirski, Israel
E. Shalev, Israel
|
|
08:30 |
SHOULD ROUTINE EXAMINATION BE
PERFORMED: ONLY BY INDICATION?
L. Chitty, UK
|
|
09:00 |
ULTRASOUND FOR ALL - BY WHOM
AND WHEN? HOW OFTEN?
F. Chervenak, L.B. McCullough, New York NY, USA
|
|
09:30 |
NUCHAL TRANSLUCENCY SCREENING
L. Chitty, UK |
|
10:00 |
CAN WE DIMINISH THE AGE RELATED
AMNIOCENTISIS RATE?
R. Frydman, France
|
|
10:30 |
Coffee Break |
|
11:00 - 13:00 HALL A
|
|
B3:
|
CESAREAN SECTION: THE INCREASING
INCIDENCE
Capsule: Should we have a strategy to minimize cesarean
deliveries?
|
|
Chairpersons: |
F. Chervenak, USA
F. Petraglia, Italy
V. Unzeitig, Czech Republic
|
|
11:00 |
IS THERE AN OPTIMAL CS RATE?
S. Kjos, USA
|
|
11:25 |
CS FOR ALL?
N.M. Fisk, UK
|
|
11:50 |
WOMEN'S RIGHT - CS FOLLOWING PATIENT'S
REQUEST: YES OR NO?
S. Paterson-Brown, UK |
|
12:15 |
VAGINAL DELIVERY FOLLOWING 2 CS (PRO)
R.H. Paul, USA
|
|
12:40 |
VAGINAL DELIVERY FOLLOWING 2 CS (CON)
S. Arulkumaran, UK
|
|
13:00 |
L u n c h B r e a k
|
|
14:30 - 16:00 HALL A
|
|
B6:
|
FETAL MONITORING
Capsule: After 30 years of experience, the question remains.
|
|
Chairpersons: |
D.R. Coustan, USA
D. Farine, Canada
M. Mazor, Israel
|
|
14:30 |
IS THERE A PLACE FOR ELECTRONIC
FETAL MONITORING IN THE LOW RISK PATIENT? (PRO)
R.H. Paul, USA
|
|
14:52 |
IS THERE A PLACE FOR ELECTRONIC
FETAL MONITORING IN THE LOW RISK PATIENT? (CON)
S. Arulkumaran, UK
|
|
15:14 |
DOES IT INCREASE CS RATE? (PRO)
R. Paul, USA
|
|
15:36 |
DOES IT INCREASE CS RATE? (CON)
S. Arulkumaran, UK
|
|
16:00 |
Coffee Break |
|
08:30 - 10:30 HALL B
|
|
A7:
|
INCREASING SUCCESS RATE IN IVF
Capsule: Although technology improved, the questions still remain.
|
|
Chairpersons: |
A. Hazout, France
N. Laufer, Israel
P. Ventruba, Czech Republic
|
|
08:30 |
IS EMBRYO TRANSFER TECHNIQUE IMPORTANT?
R. Frydman, France
|
|
08:54 |
THE ROLE OF HYSTEROSCOPY PRIOR TO IVF TREATMENT (IS HSG
ENOUGH?)
J.E. Hamou, France
|
|
09:18
|
HYDROSALPINX IN IVF - DOES IT MATTER?
A. Strandell, Sweden
|
|
09:42 |
PROTEIN-FREE MEDIUM FOR TRANSFER
D.K. Gardner, USA
|
|
10:06 |
SELECTING EMBRYOS FOR TRANSFER FOLLOWING GENETIC
INVESTIGATION
A.O. Trounson, Australia
|
|
10:30 |
Coffee Break
|
|
11:00 - 13:00 HALL B
|
|
A8:
|
REPEATED PREGNANCY LOSS
Capsule: The definition, work-up and treatment are controversial. Does
anything help?
|
|
Chairpersons: |
A. Pellicer, Spain
R.D. Kempers, USA
T. Gurgan, Turkey
|
|
11:00 |
DEFINITION AND ETIOLOGY OF RECURRENT
SPONTANEOUS ABORTION
R.F. Casper, Canada
|
|
11:20 |
IS INVESTIGATION IMPORTANT - STARTING
WHEN?
S.H. Daya, Canada
|
|
11:40 |
LUTEAL PHASE DEFECT AND SUPPORTIVE
MEASUREMENTS - DOES IT HELP?
J. Walker, UK
|
|
12:00 |
CRITICAL APPRAISALS OF IMMUNOLOGIC
TREATMENT (PRO)
H.J.A. Carp, Israel
|
|
12:20 |
CRITICAL APPRAISALS OF IMMUNOLOGIC
TREATMENT (CON)
J. Walker, UK
|
|
12:40 |
DOES ANY TREATMENT HELP? ROLE OF IV
IMMUNO-GROBULIN
S.H. Daya, Canada
|
|
13:00 |
Lunch Break
|
|
13:00 - 14:30 HALL B
|
|
LS:
|
Lunch Session
CONTROVERSIES IN REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE
Capsule: Tissue specific hormones, GnRH-antagonists, Male HRT and
innovative hormonal contraception; needs, possibilities, advantages.
Sponsored by: Organon
|
|
Chairpersons: |
B.C. Tarlatzis, Greece
J. Kahn, Norway
|
| |
13:00 |
NEW CONTRACEPTIVES ARE NEEDED
H.J.T. Coelingh Bennink, The Netherlands
|
|
13:20 |
GnRH ANTAGONISTS ARE SUPERIOR TO GnRH
AGONISTS IN IVF
P. Bouchard, France
|
|
13:40 |
TISSUE SPECIFIC HORMONES ARE SUPERIOR
TO ESTROGENS FOR FEMALE HRT
M.E. Birkhauser, Switzerland
|
|
14:00 |
MANY AGEING MALES REQUIRE ANDROGEN
SUBSTITUTION
B. Lunenfeld, Israel
|
|
14:30 - 16:00 HALL B
|
|
MALE:
|
MALE INFERTILITY
Capsule: ICSI seems to be the ultimate treatment for male
infertility
|
|
Chairpersons: |
B. Lunenfeld, Israel
M.A. Aboulghar, Egypt
C. Chillik, Argentina
|
|
14:30 |
IS ANDROLOGY PASSE?
F. Comhaire, Belgium
|
|
14:48 |
VARICOCCELECTOMY - PRO
J.L.H. Evers, The Netherlands
|
|
15:06 |
VARICOCCELECTOMY - CON
F. Comhaire, Belgium |
|
15:24 |
MALE FSH IN THE ERA OF ICSI
D. Feldberg, Israel
|
|
15:42 |
ARE THERE FACTORS PREDICTING THE SUCCESS
OF SPERM RECOVERY DURING MESA-TESE PROCEDURE?
K. Koci, Czech Republic
|
|
16:00 |
Coffee Break
|
|
16:30 - 18:00 HALL B
|
|
H4:
|
INFERTILITY HRT AND ONCOLOGY
Capsule: Fear of cancer decrease compliance.
|
|
Chairpersons: |
Y. Insler, Israel
T. Makino, Japan
Z. Shoham, Israel
|
|
16:30 |
INDUCTION OF OVULATION AND OVARIAN
CANCER - IS THERE AN ASSOCIATION?
B. Lunenfeld, Israel
|
|
16:52 |
CRYOPRESERVATION OF OVARIAN TISSUE
IN CANCER PATIENTS
R.G. Gosden, UK
|
|
17:14 |
WHAT CAN WE EXPECT FROM THAWING?
A.O. Trounson, Australia
|
|
17:38 |
THE CURRENT ROLE OF HRT IN THE VARIOUS
MALIGNANCIES
R. Sands, UK
|
|
08:30 - 10:30 HALL C
|
|
D1:
|
SERM
Capsule: SERMs for the prevention of osteoporosis: How
strong is the evidence?
Sponsored by: Eli Lilly & Co.
|
|
Chairpersons: |
C. Gennari, Italy
|
|
08:30 |
EVIDENCE BASED CLINICAL EFFECTS OF SERMs
M. Draper, USA
|
|
09:00 |
HOW MUCH DO WE KNOW ABOUT THE EFFICACY
OF RALOXIFENE VS HRT IN OSTEOPOROSIS TREATMENT?
I. Vered, Israel
|
|
09:30 |
RALOXIFENE VS HRT IN THE BREAST
TISSUE
W. Urdl, Austria
|
|
10:00 |
COMPLIANCE AND QUALITY OF LIFE
ISSUES: RALOXIFENE VS HRT
D. Hochner, Israel
|
|
10:30 |
Coffee Break
|
|
11:00 - 13:00 HALL C
|
|
C1:
|
HYSTERECTOMY
Capsule: The most common major procedure in Gynecology is facing
modification.
|
|
Chairpersons: |
T. Falcone, USA
G.B. Melis, Italy
V. Gomel, Canada
|
|
11:00 |
DO THE DIFFERENT APPROACHES STEM
FROM REAL MEDICAL ADVANTAGES OR SURGEON PREFERENCES?
T. Falcone, USA
|
|
11:24 |
TOTAL VS SUBTOTAL
J. Donnez, Belgium
|
|
11:48 |
LAPAROSCOPY VS LAPAROTOMY: SURGICAL
ACCESS
V. Gomel, Canada
|
|
12:12 |
SHOULD WE LEAVE THE OVARIES AFTER
TAH IN ENDOMETRIOSIS STATE?
J.L.H. Evers, The Netherlands
|
|
12:36 |
ROBOTICS VERSUS HUMAN GOLDEN FINGERS IN GYNAECOLOGIC
ENDOSCOPY
L. Mettler, Germany
|
|
13:00 |
Lunch Break
|
|
14:30 - 16:00 HALL C
|
|
C2:
|
ENDOMETRIAL ABLATION
Capsule: With so many methods what is the problem?
|
|
Chairpersons: |
A.H. DeCherney, USA
M. Kudela, Czech Republic
T. Tulandi, Canada
|
|
14:30 |
TO ABLATE VS HYSTERECTOMY
T. Tulandi, Canada
|
|
14:48 |
TO PRE-TREAT OR NOT PRIOR TO ABLATION?
J.E. Hamou, France
|
|
15:06 |
TO HEAT, MICROWAVE, CRYOABLATE OR
COAGULATE?
B.H. Sanders, Canada
|
|
15:24 |
HYSTEROSCOPIC VS NON-HYSTEROSCOPIC
ABLATION TECHNIQUE
H. Fernandez, France
|
|
15:42 |
MALIGNANCY FOLLOWING ABLATION. MYTH OR
REALITY?
A.H. DeCherney, USA
|
|
16:00 |
Coffee Break
|
|
16:30 - 18:00 HALL C
|
|
C3:
|
ECTOPIC PREGNANCY
Capsule: Early detection allows us to choose the best kind of treatment.
Is there an ideal treatment?
|
|
Chairpersons: |
L. Mastroianni, Jr., USA
J. Blankstein, USA
T. Tulandi, Canada
|
|
16:30 |
METHOTREXATE VS SALPINGOSTOMY
H. Fernandez, France
|
|
16:52 |
LAPAROSCOSALPINGECTOMY VS SALPINGOSTMY
A.H. DeCherney, USA
|
|
17:14 |
LOCAL VS SYSTEMIC MEDICAL TREATMENT
M. Pansky, Israel
|
|
17:36 |
CAN WE CHOOSE THE BEST MODE OF TREATMENT?
A.H. DeCherney, USA
|
|